Build Your Personal Brand: Staying Relevant in a Changing Job Market

In the current economic climate, no one is assured of employment. Even if you’ve been with the same employer for a significant amount of time, it’s wise to be prepared.

Job-hunting in Austin can be relatively easy or remarkably hard. More than any other city I’ve lived in, it’s about who you know — or who knows you. The key to finding fulfilling, dependable work in Austin is relationships.

Cultivating good business connections takes time, effort, and forethought. First, identify your relationships inside your current organization. Are they all in your department, or do you have friends across the company? Are your connections generally at the same level in the organization, or at all levels? Having a diverse set of connections is important for success in your current and future jobs. In the event of a layoff, your connections (and their spouses, friends, etc.) can introduce you to strategic people in the community. They can effectively evangelize for you because they know your strengths and are up-to-date on your skill set.

Now consider your relationships outside of work. Do you attend association meetings for your industry? Go to networking lunches?  Keep in touch with friends from previous jobs? Do you volunteer with local charities or serve on a non-profit board? These activities may seem extraneous when you’re working full-time, but they are vital to maintaining visibility in the community, which is the key to the Austin job market.

For an employer, even a little bit of previous knowledge – a recommendation from another employee, a brief conversation at a happy hour — can increase his comfort level with the financial risks of hiring. Making relationship building as much a part of your professional development as your day-to-day job activities can significantly help your employment search, should the necessity arise.

Dealing with Conflict in the Workplace

There’s an interesting article in Entrepreneur on managing conflict called Curbing Conflict, by Elinor Robin. Robin says that while we tend to see conflict centering around ideas or behaviors, it’s actually driven by emotion. She offers some useful tips for detaching from the difficult emotions that are kicked up by conflict and dealing with it openly and where possible, proactively.

I want to expand on this idea by looking at how we treat emotion in the workplace. I find that culture of most organizations and the business community as a whole only accepts a restricted range of emotions. Think about the emotions you feel comfortable demonstrating at work. Enthusiasm? Calm? Attentiveness? Courage? Gratitude? Probably all these emotions are acceptable in your organization’s culture. What about fear? Anger? Sadness? Anxiety? Confusion? Disappointment?  In most of the places I have worked, these emotions are supposed to be hidden or masked in some way, or not acknowledged at all.

No one is capable of only feeling certain emotions when at work. The strain of hiding our other emotions from ourselves and others adds to the stress we already feel when working.

Psychologist Magda Arnold theorized that all humans feel 11 basic or core emotions:

  • Anger
  • Aversion
  • Courage
  • Dejection
  • Desire
  • Despair
  • Fear
  • Hate
  • Hope
  • Love
  • Sadness

How many of these emotions do you feel comfortable expressing openly at work? Probably only two or three. Business culture, regardless of where you work, is very restrictive about how we demonstrate our feelings.

I’m not espousing that we ignore the “rules” in our organizations. Social rules are important to the functioning of organizations.  I am suggesting is that we re-address some of the coping mechanisms we have developed for following these rules. Denial, projection, and disassociation from intense emotions cause stress in individuals and shadow (unwanted) behaviors in organizations. Behaviors we label as “political”, such as gossip and rumors, often emerge as a pressure valve for the emotions we can’t formally recognize.  The further you push certain emotions out of your conscious awareness, the more likely they are to cause unintended problems to your emotional state of being, your organization, and your health.

Rather than avoiding or denying our negative emotions at work, it’s important to recognize and name them to ourselves, lest they become submerged. When we are aware of our feelings, we can find ways to express them that are acceptable within the culture of the organization. All of our emotions, positive and negative, give us vital information about ourselves and those around us.

If you’re interested in reading more about emotions in the workplace, I highly recommend Daniel Goleman’s Working with Emotional Intelligence.

800Muses – a resource site for women

My article on Mission, Vision and Values is now up on a cool site called 800Muses, a site where women share expertise:
http://www.800muses.com/muse-profiles/muse-michelann.htm

Organizational Politics: Using Your Power for Good

Can organizational politics be positive? Learn to evaluate your own use of political power, and find out how informal alliances can help build trust, foster leadership, and strengthen organizations.

Published in The Systems Thinker, February 2009. Click here to download.

Interested in learning more? DiaMind Consulting offers workshops, coaching, and presentations on harnessing the power of political networks in your organization. Click here to learn more.

Actions Speak Louder than Words: Understanding the Power of Symbolic Action

How companies communicate with their employees, explicitly and implicitly, is crucial to employee engagement. While employee engagement is considered a “soft” consideration in many workplaces, in a customer-service industry it is directly tied to financial considerations. So how do companies communicate with employees, when is it effective, and why or why not?

Symbolic Action and Dissonance
I frequent a couple of national coffee chains for my daily latte. One chain, let’s call them “Green Coffee” has a good product, and excellent staff. No matter how long the line, I can get in and out in under ten minutes, and my embarrassingly complex order is always delivered correctly. The employees are relaxed and friendly, and they’re diverse in age, race, and personality.

Occasionally, I frequent “Red Coffee”. While I like the coffee better, the employees, who are less diverse, are disengaged. Sometimes they’re friendly, sometimes not, and my order is frequently messed up (even when I’m the only customer). They generally seem more interested in talking to each other than to me.

Visiting the websites for the two companies, I notice an immediate difference on the employment page. While Red has the standard boilerplate about “putting people first” and competitive pay and benefits, Green has personal testimonials, documentation of fairly advanced training for the food service industry, and itemized available benefits including retirement and insurance for employees who work twenty hours a week or more.

From this I surmise that leadership at Green Coffee wants to present the impression that employees are valued. However, while many companies present themselves this way sometimes impressions and reality diverge. Organizations that talk a good game about employee appreciation and investment don’t always demonstrate those values, where less flamboyant companies may have values that dictate good employee/organization relationships.

For example, I have a relative who works for a national retail chain that has its home office in the Southwest. The temperature in her store (on the west coast) is regulated from the home office, so it’s often out of sync with the weather outside. If it’s 95 degrees at headquarters and the AC is cranked way up, customers and employees may be freezing in the store on the west coast where it’s only 75 degrees outside. Corporate does not allow store managers to adjust the temperature in their own stores. So while the company’s website details extensive career development and benefits available to employees, the appearance of employee value does not align with how they are treated. The organization does not demonstrate trust in employees, so it is unlikely that the employees trust the organization.

Green Coffee talks a good game, and the values they espouse seem to be active in the organization. Key indicators are the fact that they provide useful training and benefits for employees. In turn, employees seem engaged and relaxed, and provide the company with good customer relationships. These indicators are symbolic actions – ways organizations and employees act out their values, regardless of external PR or internal propaganda.

The other day when I was at Red Coffee the employee who took my order was discussing company policy with his co-worker. It seems company had issued a new list of employee edicts, including one where employees were only allowed to come in through the front door (the side door is far more convenient for cafe employees). Without knowing why the company issued this restriction, it was clear that the employee found it frustrating.

For me, this revelation made perfect sense. Regardless of what the employer said about their value for employees, their actions indicate (at least to this particular employee) that they don’t trust them. If I were to translate this action into a statement, it would say, “I (the company) do not trust you (the employee) to make basic decisions about how to behave around customers, so I will dictate how you should behave.” As an employee, I would feel that my individual value to the organization was negligible.

Is it a surprise that Red Coffee employees don’t seem to take pride in their work? Company policies towards employees communicate far more about their value than employee value statements, or titles like “partner” or “team member”.

I suspect Green Coffee’s employees seem happy and engaged because there is little conflict between what the company says about how they treat employees and how they actually treat them. This translates very directly into satisfied repeat customers and revenue.

Putting it to Work
Do your company’s values align with the policies in practice regarding employees? If you cite respect and honesty as core values, but monitor employees’ every move, you’re creating dissonance (conscious or unconscious discomfort with the contradiction between statements and actions) that affects the quality of work. If your stated values were instead consistency and quality, then close monitoring may be more appropriate. It is this dissonance between words and actions that can cause problems like employee disengagement, low productivity, and high turnover.

If your organization, like a coffee shop, relies on consistent, attentive customer service for its revenue stream, then this internal dissonance may also create discomfort for the customer. Imagine taking you kids to Disneyland and being ignored by grumpy, disengaged employees. The slogan “The Happiest Place on Earth” would become a parody, rather than a promise. Consider then that your employees represent the values you communicate to them to your customers.

Here are some suggestions to help you craft appropriate employee policies:

Be Consistent
If you have a company vision and values statement, check it against your employee policies and see if they contradict each other. If so, consider changing policies to reflect company values, or even revising your values statement if it is outdated or underdeveloped.

Be Authentic
If you haven’t developed a values statement, spend some time considering what values your company demonstrates, and how they inform employee decisions. This will help you recognize if policy and values begin to diverge. Core values are a map of your company’s DNA – they should inform how you treat customers and employees

Think Ahead
Consider the long term impact of short term decisions. When times are tight and cutbacks are necessary, don’t be caught unaware when layoffs lower employee morale, productivity, and commitment. Remember the power of symbolic actions, and find ways to mitigate the negative impact of difficult decisions, or risk losing the benefit of short term gains to long-term problems.

Mission, Vision, and Values: What are they, and why do they matter?

As an entrepreneur, I find it almost impossible to avoid writing a mission statement. I need it for my business plan. I need it for my investors. My mentors and advisors tell me I need it. But what is a mission statement, really? Why do we need it? How can it help our businesses?

Just to muddy the waters a bit, let’s look at Wikipedia’s definition of the mission statement:

“A mission statement is a brief statement of the purpose of a company…The following elements can be included in a mission statement.
• Purpose and values of the organization.
• Products, services, or market; or, who are the organization’s primary “clients” (stakeholders).
• What are the responsibilities of the organization towards these “clients”?
• What are the main objectives supporting the company in accomplishing its mission?”

That seems like an awful lot of information to cram into a few sentences that sum up my business. In reality, there are several elements that encompass the foundation of my company, and describe how I want it to be perceived.

I propose that we break this concept down into three progressive pieces, or core elements:

Core Values – Who are we?
Core values identify 3-5 terms that describe the forces that drove you to form and grow your organization. If you are the founder, they are the same as or closely related to your personal values. Your values describe not only who you are as an organization, but also who you are not. They encompass your ethics, principles, and beliefs about your organization and its relationship to the world. Core values are immutable, values that remain the same for the life of your organization.

Example: “integrity, honesty, openness, personal excellence, constructive self-criticism, continual self-improvement, and mutual respect” – Microsoft

Integrity, honesty, mutual respect, and openness speak to how Microsoft wants to be perceived by the world, and provides a basic ethical code for employees. Personal excellence, constructive self-criticism, and self-improvement are more personal and specific. They communicate to employees the behaviors that are approved (and hopefully rewarded), and by extension those that are not.

Vision Statement – Why are we here?
Vision is the reason your company exists. The world changes, technology changes, so your vision statement need not refer to your product. It conveys why you are in this business (and not another). It ties directly back to your core values. If the market changed dramatically, your vision should remain intact because it speaks to what your company represents, not just what it does.

Example: “..to help people and businesses throughout the world realize their full potential.” – Microsoft

I like this vision because it’s about contribution. If the desktop computer was no more, and Microsoft’s software became obsolete, it wouldn’t affect this vision at all. Microsoft could completely change its product line and still be aligned with its vision.

Mission Statement – What do we do?
While your mission should refer more specifically to the type of business you do or products you sell, it can also encompass what you feel your organization’s contribution will be to your industry, community, or to the world. Your mission statement may change if your company outlives the industry it started in, but it should still tie back to your core values and vision.

Example: “Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”

This is a great mission statement – it’s succinct, but it provides a lot of information. If digital information changed, Google could change its product and still be aligned. But we can also see Google’s values implicit in this statement. Universal access to information implies that Google values equality and knowledge highly, and that it sees its community as the world, not the industry or country its based in.

You may want to combine aspects of these three elements into one statement that you use externally and internally, but it’s important to differentiate between them during the development stage.

The Hard Part
So how do we go about defining these elements so they are resonant and meaningful? How do we avoid Dilbert-esque jargon, or overly lofty platitudes?

Start with yourself. If you don’t understand what drove you to embark on the journey of entrepreneurship, you can’t explain it compellingly to others. I’ve often asked entrepreneurs why they started their businesses, and the answer is very often “I wanted to make a lot of money.” This is a cop out. There are much easier, less stressful ways to make money than starting your own company. Even if you don’t know what it is, you have a compelling reason behind why you started your venture, why you’re selling the specific product or service you offer, and why you think you can succeed at it. The key to expressing this begins with your own core values.

Many people find it helpful to define their own personal vision statement. There are a multitude of books, websites, and coaches available that can help. However, I believe that defining your personal core values is a better place to start. Looking at my core values, I begin to understand the career choices I made in the past, and recognize the underlying needs and assumptions that compelled me to create my own venture. This provides a framework through which I understand my motivations, and strengthens my ability to talk to others about my company’s goals.

At that point, you may want to utilize an exercise from a book, or engage a consultant to help you further define your organizational values, vision, and mission. You if you want to communicate these elements publicly, or reserve them for your employees, shareholders, or customers. At the very least, I recommend that you have public mission statement, which may include elements of your values and vision.

Here are a few examples of compelling statements from well-known organizations:

Starbucks:
“To inspire and nurture the human spirit— one person, one cup, and one neighborhood at a time.”

Starbucks’ statement is very clever – it describes how their product adds to people’s lives, shows their focus on community, and has a little dash of humor.

Nike:
“To bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world. If you have a body, you are an athlete.”

I love how this statement defines athlete to include everyone. I’m not so sure about innovation – hardcore athletes may be able to define innovation in their products, but I don’t know if everyone can. Still, it communicates that innovation is a core value.

And here is an example of how not to write a mission statement:

“Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.”

A laundry list of accomplishments is not a mission statement. Mission statements are not used to promote your products; they describe your desire to make an impact, in your community, industry, or in the world.

Why do they matter?
Values, Vision, and Mission are crucial to setting a clear, understandable, and easily communicated direction for yourself, your partners and employees, and your investors and customers. It’s not enough to feel passionate about your product or service, you have to consciously understand what drives you in order to communicate it to a diverse group of people.

In Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, it’s often expressed as a pyramid, with physical survival-based needs on the bottom, and the uniquely human need for self-actualization on top. You can visualize an organization’s goals in a similar way:
While individuals begin by meeting their physical needs and eventually grow into higher modes of thinking, organizations are different. The more clearly you can articulate your high-level goals from the beginning, the less time and resources you will spend trying to fix poor communication, alignment, employee engagement, and unwanted cultural artifacts like destructive political networks. When you recognize the guiding force these Core Elements provide, your strategic goals and tactical plans will be more aligned, streamlined, and easier to communicate to you stakeholders.

Core Elements can also be the difference between corporate survival and failure during times of crisis. A well-known example of corporate values put to the test took place in 1982, when several people died from taking cyanide-laced Tylenol caplets. Tylenol is manufactured by Johnson & Johnson, whose company credo states that their first responsibility is to their customers. True to their values, Johnson & Johnson responded to the crisis by pulling 31 million bottles of their product from stores, and offering free replacements. While the short term cost to the company was high, the company’s fast and comprehensive response soothed consumer fears, increased investor confidence, and paved the way for future growth.

In contrast, the Ford Pinto scandal of the 1970s illustrates a story of corporate values gone awry. When Ford leadership first learned of the faulty design that caused cars to catch fire when hit from the rear, they decided that the cost of paying damages to the families of those killed was more viable than redesigning the faulty fuel tank. Either Ford’s values did not clearly emphasize ethical concerns, or they were not actively in use at the time. The botched response to the fires caused lasting damage to Ford’s reputation.

Organizational core elements inform all aspects of business decisions – internal and external.
Branding and identity, the cornerstone of effective marketing and sales, must be authentic and compelling to attract customers. When branding aligns with corporate behavior, it is a powerful force. When misaligned, it creates confusion or disillusionment in customers. Wal-Mart is known for providing great value to customers, but has a poor reputation for its relationship to suppliers and employees. By contrast, Southwest Airlines has a great customer service record, and is consistently cited is one of the best workplaces to in the country.

Similarly, internal communications and policies need to be aligned with core elements in order to be effective. Employment and hiring policies, compensation, training, and ethics must all reflect the organization’s stated values and vision. Lack of alignment creates cognitive dissonance, or confusion and discomfort in employees who recognize that the organization doesn’t “walk the walk.” Employee engagement, efficiency, retention, and innovation are all effected by how authentically, clearly, and consistently the organization’s core elements are communicated and demonstrated by leadership.

Summary
Organizational core elements: Values, Vision, and Mission are vital to your ability to communicate clearly and consistently with your customers, shareholders, community, and employees. Consciously understanding your personal values and goals, helps you articulate why your brought your company into existence, and how it contributes to the world it inhabits. Nothing is more compelling to your customers, or motivating to your employees than that.